Major League Baseball’s Hall of Fame election is just around the corner. Of course, I’m just a fan, so I don’t have an actual ballot. But if I did, here’s who I would vote for:
- Edgar Martinez
- Curt Schilling
That’s it. Just two players this year get my vote. For me, any player that took steroids automatically doesn’t get it, which dismisses many players. As for clean players, one of the things I look for in determining whether or not a person is a “hall of famer” is whether or not that player was thought of as a dominant player during his career.
Martinez makes it because he was one of the best hitters during his day. He won’t make it (at least not this year) because he spent the majority of his career as a designated hitter. But I don’t look at that as a handicap, because it is part of the game after all. Besides, he was capable of playing 3B or 1B, he just didn’t because of the DH position. He was one of the most feared hitters of his day – despite many players around him on steroids. He was a two-time batting champion, and probably should’ve been given the 1995 MVP. He was a pure hitter. His numbers don’t look quite as good because of all the steroid use by other players, but when you think about it, he really was one of the games best hitters.
As for Schilling, he gets my vote because he was very much a dominant pitcher. He played an integral role on 3 world series champion teams, was a world series MVP, was a 6-time all star, was the runner-up for the cy young award 2 times (and might’ve won a cy young if not for other pitchers who were taking steroids *Roger Clemons * cough * cough *), led the league in strike outs and innings pitched twice, led in complete games 4 times…to me, that exemplifies a dominant pitcher.
As for other players who were clean but I’m not voting for… Fred McGriff, Alan Trammel, Tim Raines, and Jim Morris just barely miss my vote.
McGriff was a good power hitter. His numbers don’t look quite as good because of the steroid use around him. But I don’t quite think of him as being a truly dominant player during his day. He was a very good player, an all star…but he wasn’t quite exceedingly dominant.
Alan Trammel was a good short stop. Had a little bit of power, pretty good speed, got on base, and played good defense. He was a good short stop, but not really an exceedingly great one, and when it comes to the hall of fame, I think a player does need to be above and beyond “great” in order to get in.
Tim Raines is a player I’m on the fence about. I might very well change my mind and vote for him next year. He was a speedy, switch hitting outfielder. He was fast. Really fast. Led the league in stolen bases four years in a row, and stole 70+ bases 5 years. One year he stole 90 bases. Those are huge numbers. However, he played during the 80’s, when stolen bases were more common than they are now. Still, though, he was fast. He led the league in batting and on-base percentage once. He walked a lot. He was a very good player. But was he a hall of fame caliber player? I don’t know. I don’t think so. At least, for now. He was good, but I don’t think he was “great.” He never won an MVP, finishing in the top 10 in voting 3 times, but never got higher than 5.
And finally, Jack Morris. He’s best remembered for pitching one of the best games ever. He was a work horse, a good pitcher. But was he a dominant pitcher? He had flashes of dominance, but was he truly a dominant pitcher for an extended amount of time? I don’t quite think so. I might change my mind on him in the following years, but for now, I don’t think of him as a hall of famer.