Who is pushing for the base at Henoko?

“Professor Hideki Uemura of Ryutsu Keizai University told the Tokyo Shimbun that the government’s priority in the matter is to satisfy the demands of the United States.”

But the U.S. government claims that the base at Henoko is being built to satisfy the demands of Japan. So which is it?

Also, mentioned in the article, Koji Yabe states that even if the base at Henoko is built, there is no guarantee Futenma Air Base will close.

Here’s a link to the full article:

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/01/26/national/media-national/isle-dispute-russia-tied-base-issues-argues-author-koji-yabe/#.XE1Cxs9Kg6U

What Can Cultural Non-Profit Groups Do Politically?

Hi Everyone,

Due to the events going on at Henoko, Okinawa, and the petition to try and save the coral reef and help protect the rights of the Okinawan people, there has been a lot of talk as to why the worldwide Okinawan clubs (kenjinkai or 県人会), such as the Hawaii United Okinawa Association (HUOA) doesn’t help Okinawa and support Okinawan issues.

In case you are not away, the HUOA, as well as some other Okinawan cultural organizations around the world, have refused to support Okinawa, Okinawan issues, and our petition. Their reason has been that they “can’t get involved in politics because they don’t want to violate their tax-exempt non-profit status.”

However, this is a lie. A BIG lie.

The truth is cultural non-profit organizations have a lot of room to get involved in politics. They are free to educate their members and the public about political issues, and are even encouraged by the U.S. government to do so. Also, their individual leaders and members are free to personally discuss politics and take political stances. (However, the leaders of the HUOA have again refused to do so.) Cultural non-profit groups under U.S. law are even allowed to participate in lobbying to a certain extent. All they have to do is work with IRS to set a certain threshold dollar amount on which they can lobby.

Here’s some information about it from the lawyers Perlman & Perlman, LLP.

501(c)(3) organizations may safely engage in the following activities:

  1. Educate the public on issues and generally encourage participation in the political process.
  2. Make presentations on your organization’s issue to platform committees, campaign staff, candidates, media, and the general public
  3. Educate all candidates and political parties on your issues.
  4. Continue your normal lobbying on issues, subject to the limitations described above.
  5. Work on behalf of a ballot measure.
  6. Conduct or participate in a nonpartisan candidate forum, so long as the forum: (a) is open to all candidates, (b) is run in a balanced way, and (c) includes a broad range of nonpartisan questions for the candidates.
  7. Rent or sell mailing lists to candidates at fair market value, if made available to all candidates.
  8. Conduct voter registration drives and nonpartisan get-out-the-vote efforts, subject to the following limitations:
  • Drives must be designed to educate the public about the importance of voting.

  • Activities cannot be biased for or against any candidate or party.

  • Nonprofits can target areas in nonpartisan ways. For instance, nonprofits may target low-turnout areas, low-income populations, minority populations, and students.

  • Nonprofits may target registration and turnout efforts to the areas or people they serve.

For those who are interested in reading the full article, here’s the link:

https://www.perlmanandperlman.com/political-activity-and-nonprofits-501c3s-beware/

So if any Okinawan cultural group refuses to support Okinawa, they cannot use their non-profit status as an excuse. It is the right of any group to refuse to get involved in politics. However, they should simply say that they do not want to get involved, rather than lie and make poor excuses about it.

And if an Okinawan cultural group refuses to support Okinawa, the human rights of the Okinawan people, and the issues that are drastically affecting their lives, is that group really an Okinawan group?

By not supporting the rights of the Okinawan people, they are in effect supporting the status quo, that is, Japanese and American prejudice and genocide against Okinawans.

Ed Case – Is he racist?

A couple weeks ago I contacted Representative Ed Case (Democrat – Hawaii) to inform him about the petition to the White House to try to save the coral reef at Henoko, Okinawa, and asking for his response. (The petition currently has over 208,000 signatures!)

 

This was the letter I sent him:


URGENT: National Security Issue – Requesting Immediate Attention

Dear Representative Ed Case,

I am writing to inform you of an urgent situation that may have a detrimental impact on U.S. national security and overseas interests. This pertains to the U.S. military base that Japan is building over the bay at Henoko, Okinawa. The Okinawan people are overwhelmingly opposed to this base for a variety of reasons, including cost, security, feasibility, economic, environmental, historical and cultural significance. The bay is home to a natural coral reef that contains hundreds of rare and endangered species, and is second in diversity only to the Great Barrier Reef. Losing this bay would be an environmental disaster, not only for Okinawa, but for the world as a whole.

Governor of Okinawa, Denny Tamaki, recently visited Washington hoping to speak with you and other Washington officials about this, but he was prevented from doing so by the Japan central government under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who has long shown racial prejudice against Okinawans.

The Okinawan government has revoked all permits for the construction to legally continue, though the Japanese central government has ignored these requirements, in a move that many legal scholars are calling illegal. Okinawa originally scheduled a referendum to be held on February 24th to allow the people their democratic right to vote on the matter, but Abe has pushed forward with the construction anyway in the hopes of crushing the will of the Okinawan people before the referendum, while passing the blame on America. The landfill is occurring as I write this.

I believe this to be an urgent matter of America’s national security interests. To continue with the landfill and construction before the democratic referendum is held will greatly insult and anger the Okinawan people; will cause many Okinawans to become disillusioned with democracy; will lead to an increase in anti-military sentiment among Okinawans; will likely cause irreparable damage to America’s relationship with Okinawa; and may increase calls for Okinawa to regain its independence from Japan. However, by stopping the landfill at least until after the referendum, many of these issues can be avoided.

Additionally, this base would cost America billions of dollars every year to maintain, with many engineers worried about whether the ground at the construction site is even stable enough to hold the base. Many military experts agree that this marine corps base would not improve America’s security, since the marines would not be used in the event of a conflict in Asia, and instead the base would only serve to heighten tensions with both China and North Korea, causing them both to bolster their militaries.

On December 8th, I started a petition at WhiteHouse.gov in an attempt to bring this issue to your attention so that you may review it more thoroughly. In just 10 days the petition reached the threshold of 100,000 signatures required to guarantee a response from the White House, and currently has over 170,000 signatures, despite having zero press coverage from U.S. media, and despite heavy censorship from the Abe administration. I am writing to you now to inform you of the urgency of the situation.

I believe this requires your immediate attention. The people of Okinawa, as well as supporters all over the world, are now looking to you to ensure that democracy is carried out for Okinawa, that this precious part of the environment is protected, and that more peaceful, friendly relations are built in the Asia-Pacific region.

I believe that my experience and position as an Okinawan-Hawaiian cultural ambassador may provide an alternative perspective and allow me to help bridge the gap between Okinawa and the U.S.. Please let me know if you have questions, or if I may be of any assistance.

Happy new year, and thank you for your hard work!

Sincerely,

Robert Kajiwara

Okinawan-Hawaiian Cultural Ambassador

 


This was his response:

 

 


 

Dear Mr. Kajiwara: 

Mahalo for contacting me in opposition to a new U.S. military base at Henoko Bay in Okinawa.

As you know, this is a difficult issue involving assuring our ally Japan’s security in Asia, deferring to Japan on internal government decisions, and addressing Okinawa residents’ concerns. While Okinawa Governor Takeshi Onaga opposes the new base, Japan’s national government believes that the U.S. military presence should be relocated from crowded urban Futenma to Henoko Bay. In addition, in December 2016 Japan’s Supreme Court ruled in favor of the central government’s plans for moving U.S. troops to the less populated part of the island. I generally believe that some continued U.S. military presence on Okinawa is critical and trust that the national and provincial governments will be able to work out a satisfactory solution as to where.

Thank you again, and please continue to let me know of your views. Please also sign up for regular updates from me and my office through my e-newsletter and social media outreach at https://case.house.gov/contact

With Aloha, 


Congressman Ed Case 
Hawai’i-First District 

 

 


He clearly did not even take the time to read my letter or the petition. His response was probably a generic reply regarding Henoko or Okinawa that he sends to everyone who writes to him expressing concern or opposition to the military presence there. Case seems to not even be aware that Takeshi Onaga is no longer the Governor of Okinawa, but in fact tragically passed away on August 8th, 2018.

Further adding to the feeling that Case merely had an assistant send a generic letter is the fact that he wrote, “I generally believe that some continued U.S. military presence on Okinawa is critical…”

Nowhere on the petition or in my letter did I ever say I was against all of the U.S. military presence in Okinawa. Rather, I very specifically stated I was against the base being built at Henoko and that I believe the base is unnecessary and very problematic. Case addressed an issue that I did not bring up, but he failed to address any of the issues that I did ask him to address. This carelessness suggests he, in fact, pays no attention to the Okinawan people, and since Okinawans make up a large portion of the local population of Hawaii (some 100,000), one could say that he cares little for the local people. The petition currently has over 200,000 signatures, which is roughly 20% of the population of Hawaii, and Case effectively ignored everyone who signed. 

Just a few days before I received this letter, Case had a strange incident in which he announced publicly that he “feels like an Asian in a white man’s body.” He has been panned by Asians (and non-Asians) for this weird and seemingly racist remark. The fact that he did not even realize that Governor Onaga had passed away more than five months prior, and was not aware of the name of the new governor of Okinawa, further adds to the feeling that Case is racist and does not understand Asian and/or Pacific Island people. Considering that the vast majority of the population of Hawaii is Asian and/or Pacific Islander, this seems to be a serious problem.

ed case
Is Ed Case racist? Does he actually care about Asian / Pacific Islanders?

Senator Angus King (Maine) remarks about Okinawa

Mr. Jon Olsen, a supporter of both Hawaiians and Okinawans, contacted me today to let me know about a response he received from one of his U.S. Senators, Senator Angus King, of Maine. The response was regarding a letter that Mr. Olsen had sent asking the Senator to create a Government Accountability Office to investigate any construction work that may occur on U.S. bases in Okinawa.

The letter is part of a letter-writing community campaign started by Veterans For Peace – ROCK. You may send the letter if you like at the link below:

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/tell-your-representative-and-senators-to-create-investigation-before-another-base-is-built-in-okinawa

 

senator angus king.jpg
U.S. Senator Angus King (Maine)

 

Mr. Olsen gave me permission to post the reply he received from Senator King publicly.

Here is Senator Angus King’s response:

 

Dear Jon,

The U.S.-Japanese alliance represents one of our most important
relationships in the Pacific, and as a member of both the Senate Armed
Services Committee and Select Committee on Intelligence, I receive
regular updates on our bilateral relationship and related military
operations. U.S. service members have been stationed on the island of
Okinawa since World War II, and the island provides a key strategic
location for U.S. military capabilities that act to ensure the
security of our regional Allies and partners, including Japan, Taiwan,
and South Korea, while deterring aggressive behavior from potential
adversaries.

I am aware that the U.S. military presence and relocation of Marine
Corps Air Station (MCAS) Futenma in Okinawa has been a source of
disagreement in Japan, and I recognize the perspective of
representatives of Okinawan communities. You may be interested to know
that, in 2017, my staff met with members of the Okinawan Assembly to
hear their perspectives on this issue, firsthand. Central to my
understanding of this issue is that the planned relocation of MCAS
Futenma to Camp Schwab in the more remote area of Henoko, is the
result of a bilaterally formed Special Action Committee on Okinawa
(SACO). In fact, the relocation represents a broader U.S.-Japanese
joint effort to reduce the base-related burdens on local residents,
and the Supreme Court of Japan has ruled against Okinawa Governor
Takeshi Onaga’s efforts to block the relocation.

Since the relocation plans of MCAS Futenma are the result of bilateral
collaboration between the U.S. and Japan, and I believe that the U.S.
military presence in Okinawa is strategically important, I do not plan
to call for an investigation of the Henoko Base construction plans at
this time. While I know this is not the course of action you desire, I
am thankful for this opportunity to explain my assessment of the
situation. Should issues related to Okinawa come before the Senate
Armed Services Committee or Select Committee on Intelligence for
consideration, I will keep your perspective on the issue in mind.

Best Regards,
[image]
ANGUS S. KING, JR.
United States Senator

 

 

 


 

Don’t like Senator King’s response? Let him know: https://www.king.senate.gov/contact

@SenAngusKing